Thursday, May 5, 2011

arrows of desire


The Royal Wedding, I know, it’s already so last week. We hadn’t intended to watch, but...what a great show it turned out to be.
All those funny hats the women wore. Like see-through dinner plates on the side of their heads. And Princess Beatrice’s wacko antlers. And the way the royal chappies in their military garb took their hats and white gloves off on entering the cathedral. All that ritualistic British class stuff, all that saluting and  waving.

I’m in the middle of reading ‘Wolf Hall’, a gruelling Booker prize-winning novel set in the court of Henry VIII. The stuffy Westminster Abbey cardinals in their gold and scarlet robes looked straight out of the sixteenth century.

And some of the dreary words they said sounded that way too. Marriage being like the marriage between Christ and The Church. Our Father, Our Lord, I had vaguely  imagined that the church might have updated itself by now.

F, aged 12, was gasping in horror and disgust at every patriarchal utterance Our Father, Our Lord  

The really strange thing is we, his parents told him to hush, because we wanted to hear. Especially the gorgeous choirs. D and I even sang along with‘Jerusalem’ Having been educated at Anglican schools we both knew every one of William Blake’s stirring words. Arrows of desire, chariots of fire...

F looked incredulous, but was about to be even more appalled when his cynical/ pagan /Buddhisty (not to mention republican)  parents started to  drone along with The Lord’s Prayer.

As a kid I thought it was ‘hello’d be thy name and forgive us our trespassers, and none of it made the slightest bit of sense and no-one bothered to explain any of it , and we said it every day in school assembly.

Long-forgotten, yet so familiar and comfortable. And probably the closest we ever came to some sort of spiritual connection.

Well I’ve clearly been successful in my  parental campaign to counter all the patriarchal  Male God crap F used to hear  from his  old  teacher. But I also feel a sense of loss, that he doesn’t know Jerusalem, or the Lord’s Prayer. Like most of his contemporaries he has little sense of the Christian foundations that underpin our culture, for better or (more often) worse.

Of course some righteous people damned the whole wedding circus as a ridiculous waste of money, shameful when so many in the world are suffering. Yes, I can easily go there, the perpetual guilt. Then again, if we waited till everyone was happy before we ever allowed ourselves to celebrate...

And I actually agreed with one of the church guys - the Archbisop of London, I think - who spoke about marrige as a symbol of hope, of new beginning. There are times when we need to celebrate collectively, not just in our little seperate nuclear units - Birth, death, marriage, the things that connect us all. The archbishop also seemed realistic about the challenges of marriage. And spoke of a ‘generous’, rather than a ‘punishing’ God.

( For decades I couldn’t even bring myself to use the word God - so overlaid with Big Bossy Bloke In The Sky connotations. It was Goddess, Great Spirit, All That Is...)

The slowness of the whole thing was sort of restful - the great unedited chunks of nothing much happening, cars approaching, cameras fixed on the empty balcony waiting for the royals to appear. Almost meditative it was, in this era of everything too thick and fast. 

And at the centre of the elaborate theatrical pageant - a young couple who looked as if they actually do like eachother a lot, and seem to know what they’re doing.

6 comments:

Rossco said...

Such an oppulent wank...that's all i can say about 'royal weddings'..
Mianstream religion hasn't changed since Jesus pored scorn on it 2000 odd years ago...as for the beatification of pope what's his name...sad stuff at best!

Pet said...

Vive la Republique! As for national celebration, I find it quite odd to choose such an event, but yea the cardinals and so in their robes (Cardinals still wear red socks, even when not in their full red garment regalia!) still make for a nice show of pump. Like Fireworks.
And yes, I watched it too, bits and pieces, in internet. :-)

Jane said...

Yes, I know it's ideologically unsound of me to have enjoyed it so much, and I AM philosphically and politically opposed to the monarchy...but hey, life's full of contradictions...( will I admit it - I even shed a few tears watching Diana's funeral all those years ago )

Sarah Wedgbrow said...

I enjoyed it. I like to be contradictory, whatevs. The pageantry and spectacle was absolutely entertaining...and like the opera, I didn't listen to the words. xx

Stomper Girl said...

I love Jerusalem too. A friend of mine (Italian descent so never heard it before) was outraged about the "builded here" grammar but I think it fits, and anyway it's 200 years old now, maybe they said builded still in those days.

There's a nice version that Billy Bragg does on his CD The Internationale. You could sneak it into your boy's aural landscape using that...

Jane said...

Thanks for your comment. Yep had a look at Billy Bragg - he's good. There is also an old Coopes Boyes & Simpson version "Jerusalem Revisited', very political and passionate in a folky sort of way